Legal Thinking: A Psychological Type Perspective

  • Marko Novak

Izvleček

The main thesis of this article is that, in terms of Jungian psychological

typology, it is thinking and judging, rather than feeling and

perceiving, that are the predominant cognitive functions in the

legal world.

In terms of the auxiliary and tertiary cognitive functions, extraversion,

introversion, sensation, and intuition are special preferences

to the extent that they are important in different aspects of

various legal professions. Their role is to explain how thinking can

be different in view of different contexts of various legal professions.

Thus, in relation to legal practice thinking is more extraverted

than introverted, with the latter applying more to legal theory,

although we find introverts in legal practice as well as extraverts

in legal academia. Moreover, legal practice is more practically

oriented with the involvement of sensation as its main auxiliary

function. However, law is about a language that consists of many

concepts that as symbols must be appropriately translated into

meaningful reality. The importance of intuition as the next auxiliary

function follows from that.

References

-
Objavljeno
2018-12-22