AI kot sodnik in problem označitve
Izvleček
Ta članek preučuje, ali bi lahko umetna inteligenca (UI)
delovala v sodnem sistemu skozi problem označitve, ki odpira
vprašanje, kako družba posameznikom in subjektom
pripisuje določene vloge ter z njimi povezana pričakovanja.
Izhajajoč iz teorije institucionalnih dejstev Johna Searla članek
trdi, da je poimenovanje nekoga za sodnika kolektivno
dejanje, ki skupaj z določenimi konstitutivnimi pravili
ustvarja status, povezan s posebnimi pravicami, dolžnostmi
in simbolno avtoriteto. Članek primerja označitev človeških
sodnikov in umetne inteligence z analizo treh razsežnosti:
formalne, funkcionalne in ontološke. Medtem ko bi umetna
inteligenca lahko izpolnjevala formalne zahteve, zlasti
ob ustreznih spremembah obstoječe zakonodaje, ter tudi
funkcionalne zahteve zaradi svoje tehnične sofisticiranosti,
ne more izpolniti ontoloških pogojev sojenja, kot so samozavedanje,
vest in odgovornost. Te človeške lastnosti predstavljajo
temelj resničnega sojenja in jih ni mogoče reproducirati
z algoritmičnimi sistemi. Ovira, da bi umetna inteligenca
postala sodnik, zato ni zgolj postopkovne ali funkcionalne
narave, temveč ontološka. Kljub temu pa lahko umetna inteligenca
služi kot dragoceno sodno orodje, bodisi pri podpori
pravnim raziskavam, prepoznavanju vzorcev in predhodnih
ocenah, dokler njena vloga ostaja jasno ločena od
vloge sodnika.
References

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Dignitas by Nova univerza, Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije. Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.