Dejavniki kakovostnega izobraževanja: kje se nahajajo zasebne univerze in kje državne?
Izvleček
V pričujočem prispevku se posvečamo kakovostnemu vidiku izobraževanja in ga postavimo v okvir razprave med zasebnimi in državnimi izobraževalnimi ustanovami. Zanima nas vprašanje, ali so zasebne univerze boljše od javnih. Na podlagi kompilacije visoko citiranih raziskav pokažemo, da so študentje zasebnih uni-verz praviloma boljši od svojih vrstnikov iz javnih univerz. Boljšo povprečno kakovost zasebnih univerz potrjujejo tudi uvrstitve na lestvici najbolje uvrščenih univerz po kriterijih Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). Podatki tudi kažejo, da so zasebne univerze bolje uvrščene na lestvici ARWU in da med njimi obsta-jajo večje kakovostne razlike kot med javnimi. Pomembna ugoto-vitev je tudi ta, da zgolj avtonomija še ne zagotavlja visoke uvrstitve univerze, niti je državni status kot tak ne omejuje.
References
Aghion, Philippe, Mathias Dewatripont, Caroline Hoxby, Andreu Mas-Colell in André Sapir. »The governance
and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the US.« Economic Policy
25, no. 61 (2010): str. 7–59.
Angrist, Joshua D. in Victor Lavy. »Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic
achievement.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 2 (1999): str. 533–575.
ARWU, 2013. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2013.html (zadnjič obiskano: 1. 5. 2014).
Baker, George, Robert Gibbons in Kevin Murphy. »Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive
contracts.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 4 (1994): str. 1125–1156.
Barlevy, Gadi in Derek Neal. »Pay for Percentile.« American Economic Review 102, no. 5 (2012): str.
1805–1831.
Barro, Robert in Jong Wha Lee. »A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–
2010.« Journal of development economics 104 (2013): str. 184–198.
Barro, Robert in Xavier Sala-i-Martin. »Economic Growth: MIT Press.« Cambridge, Massachusettes,
2004.
Benhabib, Jess in Mark Spiegel. »The role of human capital in economic development evidence from
aggregate cross-country data.« Journal of Monetary economics 34, no. 2 (1994): str. 143–173.
Bils, Mark in Peter Klenow. »Does schooling cause growth?« American economic review (2000): str.
1160–1183.
Card, David. The Casual Effect of Education on Earnings. V: Ashenfelter, Orley in David Card (uredniki):
Handbook of Labor Economics. Izdaja 3A. Elsevier: North Holland, (1999): str. 1801–1863.
Carrell, Scott in James E. West. »Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment
of Students to Professors.« Journal of Political Economy 118, no. 3 (2010): str. 409–432.
Epple, Dennis in Richard E. Romano. »Competition between private and public schools, vouchers,
and peer-group effects.« American Economic Review (1998): str. 33–62.
Figlio, David in Lawrence Kenny. »Individual teacher incentives and student performance.« Journal
of Public Economics 91, no. 5 (2007): str. 901–914.
Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962.
Granovetter, Mark. »The impact of social structure on economic outcomes.« The Journal of Economic
Perspectives 19, no. 1 (2005): str. 33–50.
Hanushek, Eric. »The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools« Journal
of economic literature 24, no. 3 (1986): str. 1141–1177.
Hanushek, Eric. »The Failure of Input-based Schooling Policies*.« The economic journal 113, no. 485
(2003): str. F64–F98.
Hanushek, Eric, John Kain, Jacob Markman in Steven Rivkin. »Does peer ability affect student achievement?
« Journal of applied econometrics 18, no. 5 (2003): str. 527–544.
Hanushek, Eric in Dennis Kimko. »Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations.« American
economic review (2000): str. 1184–1208.
Hanushek, Eric in Margaret Raymond. »Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?
« Journal of policy analysis and management 24, no. 2 (2005): str. 297–327.
Hanushek, Eric in Ludger Wössmann. »The role of cognitive skills in economic development.« Journal
of Economic literature (2008): str. 607–668.
Hanushek, Eric in Ludger Wössmann. »Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills,
economic outcomes, and causation.« Journal of Economic Growth 17, no. 4 (2012): str. 267–321.
Heckman, James. »Policies to foster human capital.« Research in economics 54, no. 1 (2000): str.
3–56.
Holmstrom, Bengt in Paul Milgrom (1991). Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts,
Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7, no. 1 (1991): str.
24–52.
Holzer, Harry in David Neumark. Assessing Affirmative Action. Journal of Economic Literature 38,
no. 3 (2000): str. 483–568.
Hoxby, Caroline. How Teachers’ Unions Affect Education Production. Quarterly Journal of Economics
111, no. 3 (1996): str. 671–718.
Hoxby, Caroline. How the changing market structure of US higher education explains college tuition.
No. w6323. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
Hoxby, Caroline. Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? American
Economic Review, 90, no. 5 (2000a): str. 1209–1238.
Hoxby, Caroline. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. No. w7867.
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000b.
Jacob, Brian. »Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the
Chicago Public Schools.« Journal of public Economics 89, no. 5 (2005): str. 761–796.
Kremer, Michael in Dan Levy. »Peer effects and alcohol use among college students.« The Journal of
Economic Perspectives 22, no. 3 (2008): str. 189–206.
Krueger, Alan. »Economic considerations and class size*.« The Economic Journal 113, no. 485
(2003): str. F34–F63.
Lavy, Victor. »Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics.« American
Economic Review 99, no. 5 (2009): str. 1979–2011.
Lazear, Edward. »Educational production.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 3 (2001):
str. 777–803.
Lucas, Robert. »On the mechanics of economic development.« Journal of monetary economics 22,
no. 1 (1988): str. 3–42.
Marsh, Herbert. »Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological
issues, and directions for future research.« International journal of educational research 11, no.
3 (1987): str. 253–388.
Mincer, Jacob. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
Muralidharan, Karthik in Venkatesh Sundararaman. »Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence
from India.« The Journal of Political Economy 119, no. 1 (2011): str. 39–77.
Prendergast, Canice. »The provision of incentives in firms.« Journal of economic literature (1999):
str. 7–63.
Rivkin, Steven, Eric Hanushek in John Kain. »Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.« Econometrica
73, no. 2 (2005): str. 417–458.
Rockoff, Jonah. »The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel
data.« American Economic Review (2004): str. 247–252.
Rothstein, Jesse. »»Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement.
« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, no. 1 (2010): str. 175–214.
Sacerdote, Bruce. »Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates.« The
Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 2 (2001): str. 681–704.
Sacerdote, Bruce. Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much
do we know thus far? V: E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin and L. Wössmann (uredniki), Handbook of
Economics of Education, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elevier, (2011): str. 249–277.
Schumpeter, Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper, 1942.
Spence, Michael. »Job market signaling.« The quarterly journal of Economics 87, no. 3 (1973): str.
355–374.
Stephan, Paula. »The economics of science.« Journal of Economic literature (1996): str. 1199–1235.
Wachtel, Howard. »Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review.« Assessment
& Evaluation in Higher Education 23, no. 2 (1998): str. 191–212.
Wössmann, Ludger. »Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international
evidence.« Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65, no. 2 (2003): str. 117–170.
Zimmerman, David. »Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment.« Review
of Economics and Statistics 85, no. 1 (2003): str. 9–23.
and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the US.« Economic Policy
25, no. 61 (2010): str. 7–59.
Angrist, Joshua D. in Victor Lavy. »Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic
achievement.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 2 (1999): str. 533–575.
ARWU, 2013. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2013.html (zadnjič obiskano: 1. 5. 2014).
Baker, George, Robert Gibbons in Kevin Murphy. »Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive
contracts.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 4 (1994): str. 1125–1156.
Barlevy, Gadi in Derek Neal. »Pay for Percentile.« American Economic Review 102, no. 5 (2012): str.
1805–1831.
Barro, Robert in Jong Wha Lee. »A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–
2010.« Journal of development economics 104 (2013): str. 184–198.
Barro, Robert in Xavier Sala-i-Martin. »Economic Growth: MIT Press.« Cambridge, Massachusettes,
2004.
Benhabib, Jess in Mark Spiegel. »The role of human capital in economic development evidence from
aggregate cross-country data.« Journal of Monetary economics 34, no. 2 (1994): str. 143–173.
Bils, Mark in Peter Klenow. »Does schooling cause growth?« American economic review (2000): str.
1160–1183.
Card, David. The Casual Effect of Education on Earnings. V: Ashenfelter, Orley in David Card (uredniki):
Handbook of Labor Economics. Izdaja 3A. Elsevier: North Holland, (1999): str. 1801–1863.
Carrell, Scott in James E. West. »Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment
of Students to Professors.« Journal of Political Economy 118, no. 3 (2010): str. 409–432.
Epple, Dennis in Richard E. Romano. »Competition between private and public schools, vouchers,
and peer-group effects.« American Economic Review (1998): str. 33–62.
Figlio, David in Lawrence Kenny. »Individual teacher incentives and student performance.« Journal
of Public Economics 91, no. 5 (2007): str. 901–914.
Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962.
Granovetter, Mark. »The impact of social structure on economic outcomes.« The Journal of Economic
Perspectives 19, no. 1 (2005): str. 33–50.
Hanushek, Eric. »The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools« Journal
of economic literature 24, no. 3 (1986): str. 1141–1177.
Hanushek, Eric. »The Failure of Input-based Schooling Policies*.« The economic journal 113, no. 485
(2003): str. F64–F98.
Hanushek, Eric, John Kain, Jacob Markman in Steven Rivkin. »Does peer ability affect student achievement?
« Journal of applied econometrics 18, no. 5 (2003): str. 527–544.
Hanushek, Eric in Dennis Kimko. »Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations.« American
economic review (2000): str. 1184–1208.
Hanushek, Eric in Margaret Raymond. »Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?
« Journal of policy analysis and management 24, no. 2 (2005): str. 297–327.
Hanushek, Eric in Ludger Wössmann. »The role of cognitive skills in economic development.« Journal
of Economic literature (2008): str. 607–668.
Hanushek, Eric in Ludger Wössmann. »Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills,
economic outcomes, and causation.« Journal of Economic Growth 17, no. 4 (2012): str. 267–321.
Heckman, James. »Policies to foster human capital.« Research in economics 54, no. 1 (2000): str.
3–56.
Holmstrom, Bengt in Paul Milgrom (1991). Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts,
Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7, no. 1 (1991): str.
24–52.
Holzer, Harry in David Neumark. Assessing Affirmative Action. Journal of Economic Literature 38,
no. 3 (2000): str. 483–568.
Hoxby, Caroline. How Teachers’ Unions Affect Education Production. Quarterly Journal of Economics
111, no. 3 (1996): str. 671–718.
Hoxby, Caroline. How the changing market structure of US higher education explains college tuition.
No. w6323. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
Hoxby, Caroline. Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? American
Economic Review, 90, no. 5 (2000a): str. 1209–1238.
Hoxby, Caroline. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. No. w7867.
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000b.
Jacob, Brian. »Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the
Chicago Public Schools.« Journal of public Economics 89, no. 5 (2005): str. 761–796.
Kremer, Michael in Dan Levy. »Peer effects and alcohol use among college students.« The Journal of
Economic Perspectives 22, no. 3 (2008): str. 189–206.
Krueger, Alan. »Economic considerations and class size*.« The Economic Journal 113, no. 485
(2003): str. F34–F63.
Lavy, Victor. »Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics.« American
Economic Review 99, no. 5 (2009): str. 1979–2011.
Lazear, Edward. »Educational production.« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 3 (2001):
str. 777–803.
Lucas, Robert. »On the mechanics of economic development.« Journal of monetary economics 22,
no. 1 (1988): str. 3–42.
Marsh, Herbert. »Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological
issues, and directions for future research.« International journal of educational research 11, no.
3 (1987): str. 253–388.
Mincer, Jacob. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
Muralidharan, Karthik in Venkatesh Sundararaman. »Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence
from India.« The Journal of Political Economy 119, no. 1 (2011): str. 39–77.
Prendergast, Canice. »The provision of incentives in firms.« Journal of economic literature (1999):
str. 7–63.
Rivkin, Steven, Eric Hanushek in John Kain. »Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.« Econometrica
73, no. 2 (2005): str. 417–458.
Rockoff, Jonah. »The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel
data.« American Economic Review (2004): str. 247–252.
Rothstein, Jesse. »»Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement.
« The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, no. 1 (2010): str. 175–214.
Sacerdote, Bruce. »Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates.« The
Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 2 (2001): str. 681–704.
Sacerdote, Bruce. Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much
do we know thus far? V: E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin and L. Wössmann (uredniki), Handbook of
Economics of Education, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elevier, (2011): str. 249–277.
Schumpeter, Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper, 1942.
Spence, Michael. »Job market signaling.« The quarterly journal of Economics 87, no. 3 (1973): str.
355–374.
Stephan, Paula. »The economics of science.« Journal of Economic literature (1996): str. 1199–1235.
Wachtel, Howard. »Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review.« Assessment
& Evaluation in Higher Education 23, no. 2 (1998): str. 191–212.
Wössmann, Ludger. »Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international
evidence.« Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65, no. 2 (2003): str. 117–170.
Zimmerman, David. »Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment.« Review
of Economics and Statistics 85, no. 1 (2003): str. 9–23.
Objavljeno
2019-06-21
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Dignitas by Nova univerza, Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije. Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
