Živalsko vprašanje: med trpljenjem in statusom nečloveških živali
Izvleček
Članek predstavi nekaj izbranih razmislekov o možnostih kla-sičnih metodoloških in normativnih modelov moralnih teorij za vključitev in utemeljitev temeljnih premislekov o živalski etiki. Pri tem so v prvem delu v ospredju utilitaristični pristopi, ki so sicer uveljavljeni ter prevladujoči na področju živalske etike. v drugem delu sledi obrat k nekaterim preostalim, alternativnim pristopom. Pri tem se v misli o živalskem vprašanju vseskozi prepleta dvoje pristopov, pri čemer je prvi univerzalistični, ki skuša pristope poe-notiti na eni sami ravni, drugi pa poskuša različna izhodišča glede živalskega vprašanja misliti izmenjujoče na različnih ravneh.
References
R. Audi, Moral Value and Human Diversity, New York, Oxford University Press, 2007.
J. Bentham, “A Utilitarian View”, v: Tom Regan in Peter Singer (ur.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations,
2nd ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.
P. Cavalieri, Živalsko vprašanje. Za razširjeno teorijo človekovih pravic. Ljubljana: Krtina, 2006.
P. Cavalieri in P. Singer (ur.), The Great Ape Project. Equality beyond Humanity. New York: St. Martin’s
Griffin, 1993.
S. Cavell Stanley, The Claim or Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy, New York:
Oxford University Press, 1979.
S. Cavell, Companionable Thinking, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, str. 91–126.
S. Cavell, C. Diamond, J. McDowell, I. Hacking in C. Wolfe, Philosophy and Animal Life, New York:
Columbia University Press, 2008.
J. M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
C. Diamond, Eating Meat and Eating People, v: Cora Diamond, The Realistic Spirit. Wittgenstein, Philosophy,
and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991, str. 319–334
C. Diamond, Experimenting on Animals: A Problem in Ethics, v: Cora Diamond, The Realistic Spirit.
Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991, str. 334–365.
C. Diamond, The Realistic Spirit. Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
1991.
C. Diamond, The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy
and Animal Life, 2008, str. 43–89.
W. Doniger, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 93–106.
M. jr. Engel, The Immorality of Eating Meat, v: Louis Pojman (ur.), The Moral Life: An Introductory
Reader in Ethics and Literature, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, str. 856-890.
M. jr. Engel, Do Animals Have Rights and Does in Matter if They Don’t? Predavanje na Rocky Mountains
Ethics Congress, avgust 2012.
M. jr. Engel in K. Jenni, The Philosophy of Animal Rights, Brooklyn: Lantern Books, 2010.
G. L. Francione, Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. New York: Columbia
University Press, 2009.
G. L. Francione, Animal Abolitionism, oddaja Philosophy Bites (13. oktober 2012), dosegljivo na:
http://philosophybites.com/2012/10/gary-l-francione-on-animal-abolitionism.html
M. Garber, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 73–84.
R. B. Goodman, Encountering Cavell: the Education of a Grownup, v: Naoko Saito in Paul Standish
(ur.), Stanley Cavell and the Education of Grownups, New York: Fordham University Press, 2012,
str. 55–69.
A. Gutmann, Introduction, v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 3–11.
I. Hacking, Conclusion. Deflection, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, 2008, str.
139–172.
F. Kafka, Ein Bericht für eine Akademie, 1917.
F. Klampfer, P. Cavalieri in kritika dvojnih moralnih standardov v odnosu ljudi do živali. v: P. Cavalieri
Živalsko vprašanje. Za razširjeno teorijo človekovih pravic, Ljubljana: Krtina, 2006, str. 195–232.
J. Mason in P. Singer, The Ethics of What We Eat. Why Our Food Choiches Matter, Emmaus, PA: Rodale,
2006.
J. McDowell, Comment in Stanley Cavell’s ‘Companionable Thinking’, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy
and Animal Life, 2008, str. 127–138.
M. Midgley, Brutality and Sentimentality, Philosophy 54(209), 1979, str. 385–389.
M. Midgley, Animals And Why They Matter: A Journey Around the Species Barrier. Athens: University
of Georgia Press, 1983.
T. Nagel, What Is it Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83(4), 1974, str. 435–450.
C. Patterson, Večna Treblinka. Človekov odnos do živali in holokavst, Ljubljana: Sanje, 2011.
T. Regan, Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9(4), 1980,
str. 305-324.
T. Regan, The Case for Animal Rights, Berkeley in Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2004.
H. S. Salt, Animals’ Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress, London: George Bell & Sons,
1892.
P. Singer, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1999, str. 85–91.
P. Singer (ur.), In Defense of Animals. The Second Wave, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.
P. Singer, Praktična etika, Ljubljana: Krtina, 2008.
P. Singer, Animal Liberation (Updated ed.), New York: Harper Collins, 2009.
B. Smuts, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1999, str. 107–120.
V. Strahovnik, The Difficulty of Animal Question, pred objavo v Poligrafi, 2013.
S. Štuva, K univerzalnemu veganstvu prek etike vrlin, v: N. F. Štante in L. Škof (ur.), Iluzija ločenosti.
Ekološka etika medsebojne odvisnosti, Koper: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko in Univerza
na Primorskem – ZRS, 2012, str. 56–64.
C. Wolfe, Introduction. Exposures, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, 2008, str. 1–41.
J. Bentham, “A Utilitarian View”, v: Tom Regan in Peter Singer (ur.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations,
2nd ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.
P. Cavalieri, Živalsko vprašanje. Za razširjeno teorijo človekovih pravic. Ljubljana: Krtina, 2006.
P. Cavalieri in P. Singer (ur.), The Great Ape Project. Equality beyond Humanity. New York: St. Martin’s
Griffin, 1993.
S. Cavell Stanley, The Claim or Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy, New York:
Oxford University Press, 1979.
S. Cavell, Companionable Thinking, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, str. 91–126.
S. Cavell, C. Diamond, J. McDowell, I. Hacking in C. Wolfe, Philosophy and Animal Life, New York:
Columbia University Press, 2008.
J. M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
C. Diamond, Eating Meat and Eating People, v: Cora Diamond, The Realistic Spirit. Wittgenstein, Philosophy,
and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991, str. 319–334
C. Diamond, Experimenting on Animals: A Problem in Ethics, v: Cora Diamond, The Realistic Spirit.
Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991, str. 334–365.
C. Diamond, The Realistic Spirit. Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
1991.
C. Diamond, The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy
and Animal Life, 2008, str. 43–89.
W. Doniger, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 93–106.
M. jr. Engel, The Immorality of Eating Meat, v: Louis Pojman (ur.), The Moral Life: An Introductory
Reader in Ethics and Literature, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, str. 856-890.
M. jr. Engel, Do Animals Have Rights and Does in Matter if They Don’t? Predavanje na Rocky Mountains
Ethics Congress, avgust 2012.
M. jr. Engel in K. Jenni, The Philosophy of Animal Rights, Brooklyn: Lantern Books, 2010.
G. L. Francione, Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. New York: Columbia
University Press, 2009.
G. L. Francione, Animal Abolitionism, oddaja Philosophy Bites (13. oktober 2012), dosegljivo na:
http://philosophybites.com/2012/10/gary-l-francione-on-animal-abolitionism.html
M. Garber, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 73–84.
R. B. Goodman, Encountering Cavell: the Education of a Grownup, v: Naoko Saito in Paul Standish
(ur.), Stanley Cavell and the Education of Grownups, New York: Fordham University Press, 2012,
str. 55–69.
A. Gutmann, Introduction, v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1999, str. 3–11.
I. Hacking, Conclusion. Deflection, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, 2008, str.
139–172.
F. Kafka, Ein Bericht für eine Akademie, 1917.
F. Klampfer, P. Cavalieri in kritika dvojnih moralnih standardov v odnosu ljudi do živali. v: P. Cavalieri
Živalsko vprašanje. Za razširjeno teorijo človekovih pravic, Ljubljana: Krtina, 2006, str. 195–232.
J. Mason in P. Singer, The Ethics of What We Eat. Why Our Food Choiches Matter, Emmaus, PA: Rodale,
2006.
J. McDowell, Comment in Stanley Cavell’s ‘Companionable Thinking’, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy
and Animal Life, 2008, str. 127–138.
M. Midgley, Brutality and Sentimentality, Philosophy 54(209), 1979, str. 385–389.
M. Midgley, Animals And Why They Matter: A Journey Around the Species Barrier. Athens: University
of Georgia Press, 1983.
T. Nagel, What Is it Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83(4), 1974, str. 435–450.
C. Patterson, Večna Treblinka. Človekov odnos do živali in holokavst, Ljubljana: Sanje, 2011.
T. Regan, Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9(4), 1980,
str. 305-324.
T. Regan, The Case for Animal Rights, Berkeley in Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2004.
H. S. Salt, Animals’ Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress, London: George Bell & Sons,
1892.
P. Singer, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1999, str. 85–91.
P. Singer (ur.), In Defense of Animals. The Second Wave, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.
P. Singer, Praktična etika, Ljubljana: Krtina, 2008.
P. Singer, Animal Liberation (Updated ed.), New York: Harper Collins, 2009.
B. Smuts, [Reflection], v: J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1999, str. 107–120.
V. Strahovnik, The Difficulty of Animal Question, pred objavo v Poligrafi, 2013.
S. Štuva, K univerzalnemu veganstvu prek etike vrlin, v: N. F. Štante in L. Škof (ur.), Iluzija ločenosti.
Ekološka etika medsebojne odvisnosti, Koper: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko in Univerza
na Primorskem – ZRS, 2012, str. 56–64.
C. Wolfe, Introduction. Exposures, v: Cavell Stanley et al. Philosophy and Animal Life, 2008, str. 1–41.
Objavljeno
2019-06-20
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Dignitas by Nova univerza, Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije. Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
